Compare results with the approved baseline and decision criteria.
A.M.P.E.R.E. TOOLKIT · ANNEX L
Post-Deployment Evaluation and Scaling
Tests whether evidence supports correction, extension, conditional progress or scale.
A decision instrument, not a paperwork exercise.
Evaluate the complete pilot outcome before extending the program or committing to broader rollout.
Start with uncertainty.
Use the annex to make the decision and its missing evidence visible before discussing a preferred product or schedule.
- 01Did the pilot achieve accepted technical and operating objectives?
- 02Are consumer, security, integration and lifecycle issues controlled?
- 03Is the evidence representative of proposed rollout conditions?
- 04Should the utility hold, correct, extend, proceed conditionally or scale?
Required inputs
- Acceptance and performance evidence
- Corrective actions and residual risks
- Consumer, cybersecurity and operating findings
- Updated cost, benefit and rollout assumptions
Controlled outputs
- Post-pilot evaluation
- Residual-risk and dependency register
- Scaling conditions and staged roadmap
- Authorized decision and rationale
Four disciplined moves.
Test representativeness and unresolved dependencies.
Review technical, operating, financial, security and consumer evidence together.
Record the authorized decision and conditions.
What this page does not do.
Pilot success does not automatically prove fleet-wide performance, affordability or regulatory approval. This educational page explains the instrument but does not reproduce its complete working tables. Use the controlled Protocol PDF and the responsible professional or authority for actual project work.
Open the complete working instrument in Protocol 3.2.
The downloadable publication preserves the full annex, version context and framework limitations.