EV Charging Infrastructure · Applied exercise

Frame a 10-unit, 60 kW charging project

A client asks for ten 60 kW chargers without vehicle schedules or confirmed electrical capacity.

Prepared byOrganizationDate

PART 1 · EVIDENCE AND ANALYSIS

Build the decision from the required inputs.

State what is known, what remains assumed and what evidence would change the decision.

01Vehicle energy, arrival, departure and acceptance limits02Site interval peak, transformer and service capacity03Parking, trenching, drainage, protection and cable routes04Backend, load control, payment, support and operating model

STATED ASSUMPTIONSRISKS AND MISSING EVIDENCERECOMMENDED DECISION AND GATE

PART 2 · PROFESSIONAL SELF-REVIEW

Score the evidence, not the effort.

Mobility basis

Calculates energy by departure rather than selecting chargers first.

Score Mobility basis0Absent1Named2Explained3Decision-ready

Demand control

Separates 600 kW connected load from an enforced managed limit.

Score Demand control0Absent1Named2Explained3Decision-ready

Whole-site scope

Includes transformer, protection, cabling, civil, software and support.

Score Whole-site scope0Absent1Named2Explained3Decision-ready

Phasing

Defines evidence-based expansion triggers.

Score Phasing0Absent1Named2Explained3Decision-ready

MODEL-ANSWER GUIDANCECompare your structure after completing the exercise.+

Build the charger mix from vehicle energy deadlines and acceptance curves.

Treat 600 kW as connected load; set a managed cap only after site capacity is verified.

Include upstream electrical, civil, connectivity, backend, permits, commissioning and lifecycle support.

Phase expansion using utilization, departure compliance and measured capacity headroom.

COMPLETE ALL ANALYSIS SECTIONS

Request Metro Power review →

Start with the system you need to understand.

Choose the planning depth the decision needs.

Frame a 10-unit, 60 kW charging project

Build the decision from the required inputs.

Score the evidence, not the effort.